Cover crop termination in Minnesota soybeans: Balancing risk, benefits and yield
Cover crop termination in Minnesota soybeans: Balancing risk, benefits and yield

Cover crops act as a vegetative physical barrier on the soil surface. Their roots and canopy stabilize soil particles, reduce erosion, and improve long-term soil productivity. They reduce compaction, improve infiltration and regulate water movement through the soil profile.

Figure 1. Tillage-Radish Cover Crops, late October 2023, Planted after wheat, in a wheat-soybean rotation, ND. Improvements in soil compaction and soil infiltration were achieved.
They also reduce nitrate losses by taking up residual nitrogen and keeping it in the system. Over time, they contribute to increases in soil organic matter and carbon, improving soil structure and water holding capacity. Legume cover crops can add nitrogen through biological fixation when conditions allow.
Additional benefits include weed suppression and potential reduction in some soil-borne diseases. Residue limits light on the soil surface, reducing early weed emergence. Brassica cover crops can influence soil biological activity and may contribute to pest suppression.
Cover crops can improve soybean systems, but the outcome depends on management. Termination timing determines how cover crops interact with soybeans at planting. This is not a fixed recommendation. It is a management decision used to balance benefits and competition.
A common starting point is to terminate about two weeks before planting, based on regional guidance from the Midwest Cover Crops Council (Midwest Cover Crops Council 2023; https://www.midwestcovercrops.org/termination/). This is a starting point, not a rule, and should be adjusted based on field conditions.
In Minnesota, weed suppression is directly linked to biomass. Around 1,000 lb/ac of cereal rye biomass provides limited weed control, while increasing biomass to about 4,000 lb/ac can provide approximately 50% waterhemp control, with higher biomass required for greater suppression (Sarangi and Ikley, University of Minnesota and North Dakota State University).
Where the risk begins
Termination timing determines how much biomass remains at planting, but soybean establishment is driven primarily by soil moisture, temperature and seedbed conditions. Termination timing influences those conditions through biomass and residue.
As cover crops grow, biomass increases. More biomass improves soil cover and weed suppression but also increases water use before termination and can interfere with planting.
In Minnesota, soybean yield remained similar across termination timings from 10 days before planting to 9 days after planting, while cereal rye biomass increased from 483 to 1,548 lb/ac over that same period (University of Minnesota Extension 2021; https://blog-crop-news.extension.umn.edu/2021/05/planting-green-in-minnesota.html).
In research conducted at North Dakota State University (Cabello-Leiva et al.), a 2024 Carrington study found that spring-planted winter barley, rye and camelina, established approximately 1 month prior to soybean, increased yields by 5–8%, although the differences were not statistically significant. These findings suggest that cover crops can help mitigate salinity through improved soil water dynamics. However, soybean yields declined when cover crop seeding rates exceeded 33% of the recommended rate or when termination occurred after the R2 growth stage, underscoring the importance of proper management.

Figure 2. Soybeans planted on green into winter rye cover crop, June 2024, North Dakota.
Additional research at NDSU showed that more sensitive crops such as corn and sugarbeet experienced significant yield reductions when cover crops (winter rye and camelina) were terminated at planting, reflecting greater susceptibility to early-season competition.
What Minnesota data shows
Soybeans can tolerate flexible termination timing, but that flexibility depends on conditions.
In Minnesota trials, soybean yield remained similar across termination timings from 10 days before planting to 9 days after planting under favorable conditions (University of Minnesota Extension 2021; https://blog-crop-news.extension.umn.edu/2021/05/planting-green-in-minnesota.html).
On-farm research from Practical Farmers of Iowa showed that terminating the cover crop 6 days before planting resulted in 68.4 bu/ac, while termination 26 days after planting resulted in 65.1 bu/ac, a 3.3 bu/ac difference under the dry conditions of that year (Practical Farmers of Iowa 2022, https://practicalfarmers.org/research/terminating-cover-crops-after-seeding-soybeans/).
Decision guide for cover crop termination timing
Cover crop termination timing should match field conditions and the targeted soybean planting date. This table is only a reference to help farmers make an informed decision; it is not a recommendation, and decisions need to be made based on field conditions and production goals.
| Table 1. Guide for Cover Crop Termination Timing in Minnesota Soybean Cropping Systems (only a tool to consider, not a recommendation) | ||
| Season and Field condition | Termination approach | Reason |
| Average conditions (temperature, soil moisture and rainfall) | About 7 to 14 days before planting | Balanced, lower-risk starting point |
| Dry soil or dry spring | Earlier termination | Preserve soil moisture for soybean germination |
| Cover crop high biomass (tall, dense cover crop, more than 1 or 2 feet tall) | Earlier termination | Reduce competition risk and improve soybean planting |
| High weed pressure (waterhemp, resistant weeds) | Later termination if conditions allow | Increase cover crop biomass and weed suppression |
| Disease or SCN concerns (Brassica cover crops) | Later termination if conditions allow | More cover crop biomass will increase the biofumigation effect at incorporation |
| Warm spring and average rainfall (or above average rainfall), well-drained conditions | At planting or shortly after | Increase the benefits of biomass and cover crops. Soybeans can handle this practice |
Final considerations
Termination timing is not a fixed recommendation, but a management practice. The two-week guideline is a starting point, but the correct timing depends on soil moisture, biomass, field conditions and the main problem in the field.
Soybean stand depends on soil moisture, temperature and seedbed conditions. While cover crop termination timing doesn’t directly establish the stand, it impacts these factors via biomass and residue. Additionally, cover crop species matter: cereal cover crops are more competitive than broadleaf species.
Earlier termination can improve soil conditions when moisture is limited or when crop emergence is a concern. Later termination increases biomass, which can improve residue cover and provide stronger suppression of early-season weeds, including herbicide-resistant species such as waterhemp, when conditions allow.
Soybeans have an advantage in this system. It tolerates later termination and planting green more consistently than other crops, providing greater management flexibility.
The goal is not only to maximize cover crop growth. The goal is to manage the system to establish a uniform soybean stand, maintain yield and improve soil health.

Figure 3. Different cover crops in late fall provide good soil erosion prevention. October 2024, ND.



